SimVis is an interactive visual analysis technology for multi-variate and time-dependent
3D simulation data on unstructured grids, which has been developed at the
VRVis Research Center in Vienna, Austria, in the past few years. The SimVis
approach to visual exploration and analysis of flow simulation data is based on
(a) interactive feature specification through interactive brushing in data views
of various kind (scatterplots, histograms, and others), (b) a smooth approach to
feature specification (similar to fuzzy classifications), (c) an intelligent way
of extending and combining brushes to access complex data inter-relations,
(d) focus-plus-context 3D visualization for spatial orientation, etc. .
In the course of the Visualization Contest 2004 (IEEE Visualization 2004),
SimVis has been used to interactively explore and analyze the simulated hurricane Isabel.
With only a few extensions such as new color maps, for example, and after
sub-sampling the data to allow interactive visualization on a regular PC, it was
possible to effectively investigate the high-dimensional and complex dataset.
With SimVis it is possible to instantly access all the data dimensions, including
3D space, time, and about a dozen of data attributes concurrently and in an integrated manner.
A 2-pages PDF-Document is available giving a brief discussion and overview about the interactive visual analysis and exploration session. More information is given below next to the images for each analysis step.
|Videos:||The video, that can be accessed through the thumbnail on the left briefly shows how the hurricane dataset can be interactively explored and analyzed with the SimVis system.|
The software runs interactively on a standard PC containing the following components:
Furthermore we made several additional datasets containing the same attributes but only one single timestep at a resolution of 250x250x50 to produce the images that can be seen below. The rendering of those datasets was still interactive at a framerate of approximately 15 frames per second.
The video capturing software (Camtasia Studio) that was used to grab the screen during the visualizations ran in the background on the same PC and was not able to grab all frames that were displayed in the 3D-rendering view. Thus the framerate during interactions shown in the video is far less than the actual performance of the system. On average around 45 frames per second can be achieved in the subsampled dataset that was used for the interactive demonstration. The update after a data selection change is roughly 0.5 seconds.
The SimVis System supports multiple ways to explore a given dataset. Firstly it
provides a basic overview over the spatial distribution of the data cells in the
3D rendering view. Here a transfer function can be applied to one selectable data
channel. The opacity that is assigned to every rendered data cell is specified by the
degree of interest that the user has specified for it. This specification of a region
that should be in focus is one of the most central parts of SimVis since interacting
with the system mostly means refining extending or modifying those regions. This can
be done in multiple linked views like Histograms and Scatterplots by brushing data items
that should be emphasized in the 3D view. Besides standard brushing (resulting in a binary classification
of the data) also smoothly brushing data values is enabled, to account for the
normally smooth distribution of data values in flow datasets.
|Results from Interactive Analysis:||
This portion stands at the beginning of our exploration and analysis of
the hurricane Isabel. In order to gain a rough understanding of the activity that happened
during the course of the simulation the first feature we selected was the lowest layer of the
dataset with a high interest on the portions that are over land. This was
accomplished by utilizing the data attribute height which represents the
absolute height of the data cell and the height over surface which is computed by
subtracting the surface height from the actual sea level height. The second step
was to overlook the structure of the hurricane and its
surrounding weather by selecting data cells containing some form of clouds as
the second feature that is visible in this video.
After the specification of those two features the exploration through the time dimension can easily be accomplished by stepping through the single timesteps in the 3D view.
Now that a basic understanding of the cloud structures has been gained, further analysis can be carried out by focusing on the question if clouds can be found in regions of high flow velocity. This can be achieved by simply selecting portions of the data set that contain high velocity and clouds. Furthermore the velocity is mapped to color in the 3D view. Again by stepping through the time dimension, further insight into the data can be gained. It can be shown, that the clouds surrounding the center of the hurricane are within regions of extremely high velocities. What can be witnessed as well is a cloud gap in this thick wall of clouds about 34 hours after the start of the simulation, that will be discussed later on in more detail.
After examining those clouds near the center an overview over other cloud portions in calmer regions of the dataset can be made by now selecting clouds in cells exhibiting low flow velocity. This selection now clearly shows the rainbands that form around the hurricane at three different fronts which will be discussed in another video more closely. Those clouds can be classified as Cumolonimbus, which exhibit the typical towering structure with a slight overcast.
Now that the structure of the cloud systems has been examined we wanted to take a
look at the factors that lead to or accompany cloud formation. Upwinds are quite
necessary for the generation of the anvil like structure of the Cumolonimbus
Clouds that have been selected at the end of the last video part and so we
changed the flow velocity channel in the scatterplot that selected those clouds
to the vertical wind component w. The thin green line marks the zero axis and
so it can be seen, that our present selection, which is marked as current
entries into the scatterplot, mostly lies above this line.
Then the cells exhibiting updraft are selected. In order to concentrate on the lower regions of the atmosphere which seems to play a big part in the process of cloud creation the selection is limited to those portions of the dataset. Again the rainbands can be recognized easily. Furthermore the asymmetry of the updraft regions around the eye are quite interesting. It seems that the gap that was visible in the high velocity clouds selection from the previous video is visible here as well. Cloud creation is normally hinderd by downdrafts and for now we assume, that in this region near the center of the hurricane such downward winds reduce cloud generation or even dissipate them. In a later video about up- and downdrafts we will discuss this in more detail.
Besides the aformentioned phenomenom we were interested in some other commonly known cloud properties like the existence of supercooled water which should exist in relatively large quantities in clouds of the proportions witnessed in this dataset. To test this we simply set the scatterplot to show the temperature and the "qcloud" channel, which describes cloud portions made up of liquid water. Here we can again test our previous selection against those two new data attributes by examining the distribution of seleced (red) portions in the scatterplot. We see, that we already selected some supercooled water, but that the biggest portion of our selection was above the freezing point, which is marked by the thin green line. The cause for this is, that we previously limited our selection to relatively low atmospheric regions. Our new selection will now encompass only the portions of the dataset containing liquid cloud water in regions below freezing point. This new selection shows that our assumptions were true and that we can find large batches of cells that satisfy this criteria at the rainbands and near the hurricane center a few kilometers above ground. In this height the asymmetry of the center is again very easily visible.
||In this step of the analysis we wanted to get an overview over the fronts that exist within this dataset and how they evolve over time. First we wanted to focus on the lower portions of the atmosphere. Along a front air with one characteristic normally pushes air with another characteristic away which often results in up and down drafts as one air mass either moves over or forces itself under another air mass. So we selected data regions where the wind is either moving up- or downwards and applied the color mapping in the 3D view to the vertical wind channel. Furthermore we windowed extreme up and down drafts out by using a custom scale for the color map. Exploring the time dimension with this selection the front structure can already be seen by looking after brightly red colored regions. Still the whole visualisation is visually cluttered a lot since too much of the data is selected. Thus we refined the selection by additionally brushing regions of high humidity and thereby were able to flesh out the previous selection. Now the leading warm front and the following cold front can be seen. Between those two fronts the relatively humid warm sector of the storm system is visible. Furthermore a third front in the north of the hurricane can be recognized which weakens relatively early in the progress of the simulation.|
The setup that was already prepared in the previous video can now be used to
explore and analyze the convectional cells within the hurricane since up- and downdrafts
have been selected and color coded in the 3D view. Updrafts are
represented as dark blue to red and downdrafts green to orange. After removing
the humidity constrain and selecting more height slices of the dataset the
shading function of the 3D view is enabled to additionally clarify the spatial
distribution of the degree of interest the selection imposes onto the data.
Convective cells can now easily be recognized by looking for regions of updrafts
neighboring those of downwards wind movement.
By examining the time dimension the very early generation of a storm cell over Florida can be witnessed, which takes place even before the main rainbands evolve. Furthermore, this visualization shows very strong convective bands spiraling out from the center of the hurricane (and to a lesser degree from the storm over florida). During our investigation we did not find any phenomenom matching those bands. Still we wanted to mention it, since those bands are so easily recognizable.
In order to gather more insight into the convective activity of the hurricane near its center we again refined our selection by brushing only cells within a certain spatial location which resulted in the selection of a slice of the dataset. By moving the brush in the lower right scatterplot the position of this slice can be changed interactively. Additionally regions of high velocity are selected and thus only areas outside the eye can be examined. In this visualization the cause for the gap in the clouds that was mentioned in the description of the first video can be seen quite clearly. Air is flowing downward in a very narrow channel and thus hinders cloud formation at this part of the hurricane. Besides this, multiple small convective cells can be seen in the selected slice right next to the eye wall.
|The eye of the hurricane is one of the most prominent features of this kind of storm. Thus it is quite easy to find and select with the SimVis system. In this video the horizontally normalized pressure data channel is used in combination with the flow velocity channel to select portions of the data set that make up the eye of the hurricane by brushing low velocity and pressure regions. The funnel-like structure of the eye can clearly be seen when the view is tilted a little. Since the hurricane is a tropical low it has a warm core which is shown in the following selection on the horizontally normalized temperature and pressure. Since the shading is not calculated again for the new selection of the warm center of the storm, the spatial outline of the previous selection can be compared to the current one.|
|At the beginning of this video the eye is selected for a better overview over the dataset. Furthermore vapor is mapped to color in the 3D view. In the first exploration phase it is quite appearant that precipitation leads to low humidity and thus a low amount of vapor in the air, as can be witnessed especially above Florida as the rainbands evolve. Now the actual precipitation is mapped to color and portions of high precipitation are selected in the top right scatterplot revealing the actual amount and the heights where precipitation originates at. Again, as in some of the previous videos, a strong asymmetry around the eye can be witnessed since the biggest part of our selection lies just a bit north of the center. In order to gain a better overview of the situation at ground level the height is limited to the lowest slice of the dataset. Additionally very high precipitation values that mostly occur in greater heights are windowed out by using a custom scale for the color map. With this selection the amount of precipitation can be conveniently tracked over time.|
|The temperature from ground level to about one km height prooved to be the most interesting in the course of our exploration, since the most information can be gained from it. Firstly, this video shows how the degree of interest is focused on relatively warm and relatively cold portions of the data in the lowest slice of the dataset. Then the time dimension is analyzed timestep by timestep. This visualization clearly shows the warm sector, the leading warm front, and the following cold front of the storm system. Furthermore, the weak warm front and its slow dissipation north of the storm can be witnessed. Besides those findings it can also be seen that the air over land is cooling rapidly at nightfall and is warming up only slowly on the next day. Furthermore the injection of very cold air into the storm system at landfall quickly cools down the storm center.|
In order to explore and analyze the topology of the flow within the data set
the wind velocity direction was converted into a horizontal and
vertical angle in a preprocessing step. Then the feature specification was
carried out on the horizontal angle by combining six 20 degree wide selections
at -60°, 0°, 60°, 120°, 180°, 240° and 300°. The resulting bands of selected
data now represented areas where the wind moves in roughly the same direction.
To further enhance the perception in the 3D view a circular color map has been
included which contains all fully saturated colors from the HSV color scale.
Pure colors (red, green blue, cyan, magenta, yellow) exactely match the
centers of our six selections and thus can be used to distinguish between the
With this setup the flow within the dataset can be observed and overviewed conveniently. Vortices and saddle points can be located by looking for points where all six selected bands meet. In order to distinguish vortices from saddles, the order of the colors has to be considered. If a vortex lies around the point of interest, the different bands, which have to be viewed in a clockwise order, must be colored like the color scale downwards. To detect whether it is a cyclonic or anticyclonic vortex the location of the bands has to be checked. A cyclonic vortex, like the hurricane itself, always has its green band at the east while anticyclonic vortices have theirs on the west side. Every point of interest that is no vortex is a saddle.
With this knowledge we examined the dataset and realized that there are some vortices and saddle nodes besides the hurricane itself. Those are rather weak and mostly confined to thin layers of the atmosphere. The only exception to this is a saddle node and an anticyclonic vortex that can be witnessed at about 13 km height. The saddle and the anticyclone seem directly connected to the main vortex of the hurricane and are also moving together as time progresses.
||The extremely low central pressure within the center of a hurricane is, like its eye, another very impressing characteristic of such storm systems. In order to visualize this we made several small selections in the pressure data attribute to generate the impression of iso-surfaces. By stepping through time the extreme stability of this low pressure system can be witnessed.|
||The eyewall is the border between the calm eye and its inhospitable surroundings. To extract this border from the data we had to spatially derive the wind velocity in a preprocessing step. Next we selected portions of the data that were in regions with low horizontally normalized pressure and exhibit high spatial velocity differences.|
To classify the hurricane during the simulated timespan we decided to map the
wind velocity to a discrete colorscale which assigns the categories
of a tropical cyclone to different colors. In order to gain further insight into
the velocity distribution near the center of the storm we used the horizontal wind
direction angle and the horizontally normalized pressure to specify only a slice
of the highest velocity regions. By tracking the hurricane center throughout the
course of the simulated timespan the classification into the different
categories can be easily made by looking up the corresponding entries in this